Skip navigation
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLester, Max-
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-02T21:02:35Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-02T21:02:35Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2691-9729-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2451/75751-
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the Classical and Romantic philosophical theories of the sublime in the works of Longinus, Hegel, Burke, and Kant using architectural and art historical elements as a means of analysis. In studying these philosophers’ definitions of the sublime, from mathematical perfection to the ineffable chaos of nature, the sublime is seen to stem from various visual catalysts. While the sublime may not be caused by the same visual stimulus, the emotion of the sublime appears universal.en
dc.publisherNYU Global Liberal Studiesen
dc.rightsThe author(s) hold the copyright in the manuscript and have the right to grant a license to publish their work. They retain all rights to the work and grant NYU, on behalf of The Interdependent, a nonexclusive, royalty free, irrevocable license to publish the manuscript in both print and digital form.en
dc.subjectAesthetic Sublime; Beauty; Longinus; G.W.F. Hegel; Edmund Burke; Immanuel Kant; Anthropomorphic Columns; Ancient Greek Columns; Soul; Sublime Emotionen
dc.titleThe Philosophies of the Aesthetic Sublimeen
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33682/snss-x37n-
Appears in Collections:The Interdependent, Volume 1 Spring 2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Lester.pdf494.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in FDA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.